Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update
Pulse On Wellcare
update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Healthcare
    • Trends
    • Insights
    • Southwest
    • Strategies
    • Prevention
    • Lifestyle
    • Mental Health
    • Preventative Care
    • Nutrition & Meal Planning
    • Telemedicine Access
    • Workplace Wellness
    • Wellness Tips
  • Events
  • Healthy Aging
December 23.2025
2 Minutes Read

Biologics and Cancer: A Safe Option for Psoriasis Patients?

Close-up of psoriasis plaques illustrating biologics safety in psoriasis patients with cancer

Understanding the Safety of Biologics in Patients with Psoriasis and Cancer

Recent research has revealed that biologic therapies for psoriasis demonstrate a comparable safety profile to conventional systemic agents, even in patients with a history of cancer. Conducted as a retrospective study involving 333 treatment episodes among 174 patients, the findings illuminate vital insights into how these therapies can be managed amidst cancer concerns.

Comparative Safety: Biologics vs. Conventional Treatments

In the study led by Dr. Danielle Bar, patients with a history of malignancies were observed over a median follow-up of six years, revealing almost identical rates of cancer progression and recurrence across biologic and conventional treatment groups. Statistically, the numbers were compelling: 10.7 per 100 patient-years for biologics versus 10.5 for conventional treatments.

This paves the way for a re-evaluation of treatment guidelines that often discourage the use of biologics in patients with a recent history of cancer, as the perceived risks may not match the reality. Medline suggests biologics may be more effective than previously believed, particularly in situations where psoriasis severity might necessitate aggressive treatment.

Impact of Cancer History on Treatment Choices

Despite guidelines recommending caution regarding biologic use in cancer patients, the study offers a nuanced perspective that treatment decisions could depend more significantly on psoriasis severity than cancer history. Clinical experience corroborates this; as Professor Caitriona Ryan notes, many patients suffer adverse effects of untreated psoriasis that extend beyond skin symptoms.

Moreover, modern biologic treatments targeting specific pathways, such as IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors, have undergone extensive safety assessments, consistently showing no significant increase in cancer risk compared to untreated patients.

Emerging Evidence and Expert Insights

Experts emphasize the importance of open dialogues between dermatologists and oncologists when making treatment decisions. Professor Ryan highlights the value of a multi-disciplinary approach, ensuring treatments align with cancer care while addressing the patient’s dermatological needs effectively. A growing body of evidence suggests that patients under biologic treatments often fare better in overall health management due to more controlled chronic inflammation.

The statistics from various studies paint a reassuring picture: long-term data show negligible differences in cancer diagnosis rates between patients treated with biologics versus those receiving conventional therapies.

Conclusion: Moving Forward with Caution and Confidence

While there remain inherent limitations in observational studies, the aggregate data is paving the way for more informed treatment approaches for psoriasis patients with cancer histories. The collaborative framework that blends dermatological care with oncological safety promises to improve patient outcomes considerably.

Strategies

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
01.08.2026

The Critical Risks of Skipping Chemotherapy After Eye Surgery for Kids

Update Understanding Retinoblastoma: The Basics of Eye Cancer in ChildrenRetinoblastoma is a type of cancer that affects the retina, particularly in young children. It typically arises when there is a mutation in the genes responsible for regulating cell growth. Children diagnosed with this aggressive form of eye cancer often undergo surgery known as enucleation, where the affected eye is removed to prevent the spread of cancer cells. Research indicates that when the tumor invades the optic nerve, the stakes of treatment become even higher, requiring careful consideration of further therapeutic options.Why Skipping Chemotherapy May Be DangerousA new study highlighted in Ophthalmology Retina sheds light on the significant risks associated with forgoing chemotherapy post-surgery in children with aggressive forms of retinoblastoma. The study tracked 292 children who underwent enucleation between 2011 and 2020. Alarmingly, results demonstrated that those who did not receive chemotherapy after surgery faced a 19.31-fold higher risk of tumor recurrence in the eye socket compared to their treated counterparts.Specifically, the research found that 31% of children who were treated with observation alone experienced a recurrence of cancer in the orbit within 16 months of surgery, compared to only 2% in those who received adjuvant chemotherapy. Likewise, metastasis rates and mortality were notably higher in untreated children, with figures showing a drastic disparity between the two groups.Exploring the Implications of Adjuvant ChemotherapyThe implications of these findings are profound. Adjuvant chemotherapy, which is administered after the primary treatment to eliminate remaining cancer cells, appears to not only mitigate the risk of recurrence but also enhances overall survival rates among this vulnerable population. The urgency to administer follow-up treatment is underscored by the fact that all children who developed metastasis ultimately succumbed to the disease during the study's follow-up period.Limitations of the StudyWhile the findings are compelling, it's important to acknowledge certain limitations of the study. The diverse cancer protocols across various treatment centers may introduce variability in outcomes. Additionally, the small cohort of children who did not receive chemotherapy restricts the confidence in the estimates about risk factors associated with adjuvant therapy.Future Considerations: Expanding Knowledge and ResearchAs the medical community assesses these findings, it becomes crucial to foster more comprehensive research surrounding pediatric cancer treatments and outcomes. By understanding the potential consequences of skipping necessary adjuvant therapies, doctors can better advocate for children facing such serious health challenges.Furthermore, increased awareness and dialogue about treatment options in pediatric patients can help empower parents to make informed decisions regarding their child’s cancer care.

01.07.2026

Can Radiotherapy Boost Immunotherapy Success Rates in SCLC Patients?

Update Radiotherapy’s Growing Role in Treating SCLC In recent years, the treatment landscape for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has undergone significant changes, particularly with the integration of immunotherapy. A compelling systematic review has indicated that consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (cTRT) may enhance the efficacy of this therapeutic approach. Findings show that patients receiving cTRT alongside platinum-etoposide chemotherapy exhibited improved overall and progression-free survival rates, highlighting the nuanced role that radiotherapy plays in contemporary oncology. Key Findings from the Meta-analysis The meta-analysis reviewed data from 20 studies involving over 5,200 patients, revealing that patients who underwent cTRT in addition to their immunotherapy treatments had markedly better outcomes. Specifically, their median overall survival jumped from 14.55 months to 20.25 months, and their progression-free survival saw an increase from 6.47 months to 9.85 months when compared to those who did not receive cTRT. Furthermore, the data suggests potential benefits even in patients with baseline brain metastases, indicating a novel abscopal effect where localized radiotherapy might stimulate broader systemic immune responses. Exploring Future Therapeutic Strategies The mounting evidence supporting cTRT opens pathways for further clinical trials, such as the RAPTOR trial, which is exploring the combinatory potential of radiotherapy and immunotherapy specifically for patients with extensive-stage SCLC. The trial aims to evaluate whether this approach can improve local and systemic tumor control, or whether it can significantly enhance patient outcomes. By stratifying participants based on their responses to initial treatments, the RAPTOR trial can refine therapeutic strategies to achieve superior results. Impact of Radiotherapy on Adverse Events While the advantages of combining cTRT with immunotherapy are becoming clearer, it’s essential to note the associated risks. Although the addition of cTRT did not correlate with a significant increase in severe treatment-related adverse events overall, it did raise concerns about pneumonitis, a common side effect. Approximately 3.86% of patients experienced grade 3 pneumonitis, necessitating a vigilant approach to managing potential treatment complications. Understanding the Broader Implications The implications of these findings extend beyond individual patient cases. Integrating cTRT into first-line therapies could reshape standard treatment protocols, potentially granting healthcare professionals a new tool for addressing some of the most challenging aspects of SCLC. Such adaptations within oncology are not merely about responsiveness but about proactive, integrative care that considers both local and systemic factors affecting cancer progression. Final Thoughts: Navigating the Future of SCLC Treatment As research continues to unravel the complexities of SCLC treatment, the combination of cTRT and immunotherapy holds promise. Ongoing studies will further refine our understanding of these strategies, ensuring that patients receive not only the most effective care but also the best quality of life possible. Continued vigilance in monitoring side effects will be equally vital, balancing the potential therapeutic benefits with patient safety and wellness.

01.04.2026

Breakthrough Gene Editing Therapy Ends Transfusions for Beta Thalassemia Patients

Update A Breakthrough in Gene Therapy Revolutionizes Treatment for Beta ThalassemiaThe recent success of a groundbreaking gene-editing therapy has changed the landscape for patients suffering from beta thalassemia, an inherited blood disorder that complicates life with the need for frequent blood transfusions. At University College London Hospital, the first patient treated with exagamglogene autotemcel (exa-cel), marketed as Casgevy, celebrated her first Christmas without the burden of ongoing transfusions, a milestone achievement that promises hope to many worldwide.The Science Behind Exa-cel: How CRISPR is Changing LivesExa-cel employs CRISPR-Cas9 technology, a powerful tool that enables precise genetic modifications. This treatment involves collecting a patient’s own stem cells and using them to correct the genetic defect responsible for beta thalassemia. Specifically, the therapy inactivates the BCL11A gene, leading to the restoration of fetal hemoglobin production, thus improving red blood cell function. In international trials, an impressive 93% of patients remained transfusion-free for at least one year after treatment, showcasing the therapy's potential to free patients from lifelong transfusion dependence.A Personal Journey: From Lifelong Transfusions to FreedomKavita Mehta, diagnosed with beta thalassemia as an infant, endured the stress of regular blood transfusions throughout her life. Her story underscores the profound impact that gene therapy can have on daily living. As she reflected on her past—the difficulties of arranging transfusions during family travels and the invasive nature of iron chelation therapy—Mehta expressed her excitement about the prospect of a future where younger generations can avoid similar struggles.The Wider Implications for Genetic DisordersThe implications extend beyond beta thalassemia. The success of exa-cel could pave the way for advancements in the treatment of other genetic conditions, including sickle cell disease, showcasing a broader applicability of CRISPR technology in genetic medicine. This one-time treatment contrasts sharply with traditional options such as stem cell transplants, which are often limited by donor availability and the risk of rejection.Challenges and Future DirectionsWhile the initial results are promising, challenges remain. The safety and long-term efficacy of exa-cel will continue to be monitored through long-term follow-up studies. As researchers gather more data, they will refine these therapies to mitigate risks associated with gene editing. Moreover, the economic aspects—namely the accessibility of this treatment through healthcare systems like the NHS—will be crucial in determining the therapy’s widespread adoption.Conclusion: A New Era for PatientsThe advent of gene-editing therapies like exa-cel signals a transformative moment for patients suffering from genetic disorders. By targeting the root causes of conditions like beta thalassemia, such therapies offer a promising alternative to traditional lifelong treatments. As ongoing studies continue and methods evolve, the medical community may soon witness an era defined by effective, one-time interventions that change lives forever.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*